As should be obvious to anyone, the political climate these days is pretty divisive, and often in the center of that divisiveness is Donald Trump. This polarization is not just in the world in general; there has been a lot of debate within the Church on how to approach someone like him, who may push for some things Christians want like not allowing wanton late-term abortions but in other ways represents things that make it hard to support him. I’ve long advocated for a nuanced, fair, but critical view of Trump (and any politician, really), as I’ve made clear on this blog, but what tends to happen is tribalism instead.
It is into this environment that the so-called Red Letter Christians (RLCs) have tried to speak up over the last several months, putting out public statements condemning Trump and his policies. Many on the Left, both secular progressives and progressive Christians, have praised these statements as showing “principled” Christianity as opposed to those hateful Christians who voted for Trump. The organization gets its name from the fact that many Bibles print the words of Jesus in red letters to distinguish them from the rest of the text. As one of its leaders and founders Tony Campolo has tried to put it, RLCs allegedly ask this simple question: What if Jesus actually meant what he said? They then try to build what they believe to be a more authentic version of Christianity over and against traditional evangelicalism.
As should be clear to anyone who has read some articles on this blog, I’m far from a fan of Donald Trump, and I’ve been critical of him as well as many Christians who I feel blindly defend him no matter what he has said and done. Thus, there is no doubt that some of the criticisms of Trump and politically conservative Christians by RLCs are correct. That said, there are some serious problems with them, as they are an organization with double standards, a pitiful approach to exegesis, and ultimately very shallow theology that is informed more from their feelings and the world than any robust treatment of Scripture or careful reasoning. Don’t get me wrong; I do not intend to question anyone’s salvation, and no doubt people who identify as RLCs have done a lot of good charity work. Nonetheless, it is not an organization to take very seriously as a strong theological voice for any scripturally-minded Christian.